The future will be shaped by optimists

Link: https://www.ted.com/talks/kevin_kelly_the_future_will_be_shaped_by_optimists
Speaker: Kevin Kelly
Date: August 2021
文章目录
- The future will be shaped by optimists
- Introduction
- Vocabulary
- Transcript
- Summary
- 后记
 
Introduction
“Every great and difficult thing has required a strong sense of optimism,” says editor and author Kevin Kelly, who believes that we have a moral obligation to be optimistic. Tracing humanity’s progress throughout history, he’s observed that a positive outlook helps us solve problems and empowers us to forge a path forward. In this illuminating talk, he shares three reasons for optimism during challenging times, explaining how it can help us become better ancestors and create the world we want to see for ourselves and future generations.
Vocabulary
temperament: 美 [ˈtemprəmənt] 性情,性格,气质
optimism definitely is not just a sunny temperament, a kind of a blindness to the realities of the world’s problems or some kind of Pollyanna self-delusion. 乐观绝对不仅仅是一种阳光的气质,一种对世界问题现实的视而不见或某种盲目乐观的自欺欺人。
Pollyanna self-delusion
“Pollyanna自欺欺人”指的是一种过度乐观的态度,即使面对挑战或负面情况也能保持乐观,甚至忽视或淡化现实中的问题或困难。这个术语“Pollyanna”源自埃莉诺·H·波特(Eleanor H. Porter)的小说《波莉安娜》中的主人公,她以其无与伦比的乐观态度而闻名。而“自欺欺人”则指的是欺骗自己,相信不真实的事情或忽视令人不快的真相。因此,“Pollyanna自欺欺人”意味着某人过分乐观,甚至忽视现实或沉迷于美好的想法,以至于不顾现实。
smallpox: 天花
surplus:剩余,过剩,盈余
raider:美 [ˈreɪdər] 抢劫者,袭击者
It’s about the family farmers whose year of surplus food was not stolen by raiders.:这是关于那些家庭农场主,他们那一年的剩余粮食没有被掠夺者偷走。
shun:美 [ʃʌn] 回避,避开,避免
optimists don’t shun problems. 乐观主义者不会回避问题。
impede:美 [ɪmˈpiːd] 阻碍,妨碍
conduit:美 [ˈkɑnˌd(j)uət] 水管,管道
But problems don’t impede progress. Problems are the conduit of progress. No problems, no progress. 但是问题不会阻碍进步。问题是进步的管道。没有问题,就没有进步。
Transcript
I want to try and persuade you
that there are reasons why
 we should be optimistic in general.
And that’s a very difficult
 thing to do today
because we are confronting
 tremendous problems in this world.
Things like global climate change,
which seem almost impossible to solve,
or social inequality,
which seems endemic
 and difficult to eliminate.
The scale of these problems though
is even more reason
 why we should be optimistic.
Because what we know is that in the past,
every great and difficult thing
 that has been accomplished,
every breakthrough,
has in fact required
a very strong sense of optimism
that it was possible.
Think of the first airplanes.
It’s hard enough
to create something good and great
 deliberately and with intention.
And it’s no guarantee,
just because we believe something
 will happen that it will happen,
but we do know that unless
 we believe that something can happen,
it’s not going to happen
 inadvertently by itself.
And so it becomes really important
that we imagine a world that we want,
that we imagine solutions we want
and believe that we can make them happen.
And that belief in making
 something impossible happen
is what has shaped our future so far.
So our own history has been
 basically shaped by optimists,
and if we want to shape the future,
we need to be optimistic.
That world that we’re shaping
 is not a world that’s perfect.
It’s not perfection,
there’s no lack of problems,
there’s no absence of bad things.
It is totally not utopia.
It’s what I would call pro-topia:
a world in which things
 are a little bit better.
And that sense of optimism
 is a perspective
where we expect the world to yield
 a little bit more good than bad,
to have a few more reasons
 to hope than to fear.
And optimism definitely is not
 just a sunny temperament,
a kind of a blindness to the realities
 of the world’s problems
or some kind of Pollyanna self-delusion.
Instead, optimism is based
 on the fact of historical progress,
that if we transcend anecdote
and look at data
 in a scientific, rational way,
that we can see that the evidence says
that on average,
on a global scale over time,
over the last 500 years,
there has been incremental
 improvement over time.
If it’s real then why don’t
 we see more of it?
Why are so many people pessimistic?
And I think there are three reasons why.
One is that most of what progress is about what does not happen.
It’s about all the things that could
 have happened that didn’t happen today.
It’s about the two-year-old child
 who did not die of smallpox.
It’s about the family farmers
whose year of surplus food
 was not stolen by raiders.
They don’t make the headlines.
And the second reason is that bad things
 happen faster than good things.
Good things take time.
When we are compressing our news cycle
 to the last five minutes
and the next five minutes,
all the things that have changed
 in the last five minutes
are kind of bad stuff
because good stuff takes longer.
If we were to make newspapers and websites
to be updated every 100 years,
we’d have a very different
 set of headlines.
The third reason is that because societies
 that are capable of creating
just a few percent more good
 than they destroy every year,
if you have a society that’s capable
of making just a few percent
 more than it destroys,
then over time,
that few percent is compounded.
And that is what civilization is.
So that one percent,
 few percent, is almost invisible
in the noise of the 49-percent crap
 and destruction around it.
So we don’t see it
unless we turn around
 and look back into the past.
So it’s possible that after
 500 years of progress,
it could stop tomorrow.
But it’s unlikely
and very, very probable
 that that long-term trend will continue,
at least for the rest of your lives.
So this optimism makes us realists
in aligning ourselves
 with this long history
of historical progress.
And that’s the first reason
 we should be optimistic.
And the second reason
 is that civilization is a mechanism
to make these improvements
that relies on the fact
 that we’re optimistically trusting others.
We have total strangers
 that we can collaborate,
and that collaboration allows us
 to make things beyond ourselves
that are bigger than just what we can do.
That requires trust,
and trust is a type of optimism.
But in addition to kind of cooperating
with the eight billion total strangers
 on this planet accomplishing great things,
we can also trust future generations.
The billions of people
 yet unborn into the future.
Right now, today, we are benefiting
 from the work of previous generations
who undergone to create infrastructure –
roads canals, skyscrapers,
 telephone networks –
that we are now enjoying.
In fact, we may be enjoying more benefits
 than they have back in the past
when they began.
So they have been acting
 as good ancestors for us,
and sometimes even sacrificing
what could have been immediate
 yields and benefits
and postponing them until
 future generations.
We also want to be good ancestors,
and being good ancestors trying to move
 benefits to the future generations
is an act of optimism.
One, because we believe
 that there will be future generations,
and two, because we are willing
 to sacrifice immediate gains
in order to postpone –
have more gains into the future –
that investment.
Being a good ancestor enables us
 to actually accomplish things
not just beyond what we can do
 individually in the present,
but what we can do over time.
So when we trust the future,
one of the things
 that we are understanding
is that future generations
 not only have better living standards
because of progress,
but they also have more
 capability to solve problems
because there’s more knowledge
and because they have better tools.
And so we can trust that.
We can trust the fact that in the future,
future generations will be able
 to solve problems
that we cannot solve ourselves.
So that means that we
 should be optimistic
not because we believe that our problems
 are smaller than we thought.
We should be optimistic because we believe
that our capacity to solve problems
 is greater than we thought.
So that’s a second reason
 to be optimistic.
The third one has to do with problems
which are really disguised
 as opportunities.
OK, so optimists don’t shun problems.
Optimism is about embracing problems,
because it’s problems that make solutions
and solutions that make problems.
So I believe that most
 of the problems we have today
are generated by
 the solutions of the past.
And the great one is this climate change.
The solution in the past
 was artificial power –
“Where do we get it?”
“OK, here it is.”
But now it makes the problem now.
That means that today,
most of the solutions that we have
will be generating
 the problems of the future.
And there will be more problems
because new solutions
 create many more problems.
In the same way, when science
 answers a question,
that answer will generate
 two or three new questions –
things that we didn’t even know
 we didn’t know.
And so, in a peculiar way,
science is expanding our ignorance
 faster than our knowledge.
So we have an unlimited pool
 of questions and problems.
But problems don’t impede progress.
Problems are the conduit of progress.
No problems, no progress.
That is why I reject utopia,
because there are no problems there.
So even bad things that happen
 are basically possibilities
that yield new solutions
 and better opportunities.
So in that way, problems are unlimited.
There is no limit for improvement.
So we can improve ourselves
 in all directions.
So we have a choice about optimism.
It’s not a temperament.
No matter what your temperament is
 you can still choose to be optimistic.
And gigantic problems
 require gigantic optimism.
We have a moral obligation
 to be optimistic,
because when we’re optimistic,
we can shape the future,
we can become better ancestors,
we can expand our reach –
create things bigger than ourselves.
And we can be a realist in aligning
 ourselves with this long arc of history
and embracing problems as opportunities.
With optimism,
we can use it as a power
 to kind of create the future that we want.
This is the way.
Thank you.
(Applause)
Summary
Kevin Kelly’s speech revolves around the theme of optimism in the face of daunting global challenges. He acknowledges the existence of significant problems such as climate change and social inequality but argues that the scale of these challenges is precisely why optimism is warranted. Kelly asserts that historical progress and breakthroughs have always been fueled by a strong sense of optimism that change is possible. He emphasizes the importance of envisioning a better world and believing in our capacity to make it a reality.
Kelly delves into the concept of “pro-topia,” describing it as a world where incremental improvements lead to a slightly better existence. He clarifies that optimism is not merely a sunny disposition but rather a rational perspective based on historical progress. He addresses common reasons for pessimism, including the tendency to focus on negative events and the invisibility of incremental progress amid larger societal challenges. Kelly advocates for embracing problems as opportunities for progress, rejecting the notion of utopia in favor of continuous improvement.
In the final section of his speech, Kelly explores the role of trust and cooperation in driving progress. He emphasizes the importance of trusting future generations and being good ancestors by investing in long-term solutions. Kelly contends that problems are the catalysts for progress and that optimism enables us to shape the future positively. He concludes by asserting that optimism is a choice and a moral obligation, empowering us to create a better world through collaboration, innovation, and a belief in our collective ability to overcome challenges.
后记
2024年4月30日16点24分完成这篇演讲的学习。