①The debate on “==” has been going on for years. How much technology is enough in the classroom? Should textbooks be replaced by computers?
“课本与计算机”之间的辩论已经持续多年。在课堂上，多少科技才算足够？课本应该被计算机取代吗？
②There is no doubt that computers are powerful tools. Computer-based lesson plans are updated in real time. New information can be added as soon as changes take place. Students can find the latest information for the subjects they are studying.
毫无疑问，计算机是强大的工具。基于计算机的课程计划是实时更新的。一旦有变化，新的信息就可以立即添加。学生们可以找到他们正在学习的科目中的最新信息。
③With computers, students can learn how to use them for the rest of their lives. Today, computers are used in almost all areas. Students can prepare themselves better for the future if they have computers.
借助计算机，学生们可以学会如何在未来的生活中使用它们。今天，计算机几乎在所有领域都有应用。如果学生们拥有计算机，他们可以更好地为未来做好准备。
④However, despite these advantages, I think textbooks must stay.
然而，尽管有这些优势，我认为课本仍然必须保留。
⑤Textbooks are professionally edited. All the facts have been checked. They are put together in the best way. Each chapter builds on what a student has previously learned. On the internet, however, not all the information is true or organized.
课本经过专业编辑，所有的事实都经过核实。它们以最好的方式编排，每一章都是在学生已学过内容的基础上构建的。然而，在互联网上，并非所有信息都是真实或有条理的。
⑥With textbooks, it is easier for students to take notes. Scientists have found that taking notes by hand helps students learn more.
使用课本时，学生们更容易做笔记。科学家发现，手写笔记有助于学生更好地学习。
⑦Textbooks are also less expensive than computers. While most families can afford textbooks, not all of them can afford a computer. Every student should be allowed to learn what he needs to learn. It’s wrong to rob a student of his right to learn just because he can’t afford the material.
课本也比计算机便宜。虽然大多数家庭能负担得起课本，但并不是每个家庭都能负担得起计算机。每个学生都应该有权学习他需要学习的内容。因为负担不起学习材料而剥夺学生学习权利是错误的。
⑧Computers are playing an important role in education. They allow students to learn more. However, I don’t think they can replace textbooks. If students want to learn well, they must use textbooks. Do you agree with me?
计算机在教育中扮演着重要角色。它们让学生能够学到更多。然而，我认为它们不能取代课本。如果学生想学得好，他们必须使用课本。你同意我的看法吗？
==
逐句翻译，不需要序号，先英文然后中文相间
①The debate on “textbooks vs. computers” has been going on for years. How much technology is enough in the classroom? Should textbooks be replaced by computers?
②There is no doubt that computers are powerful tools. Computer-based lesson plans are updated in real time. New information can be added as soon as changes take place. Students can find the latest information for the subjects they are studying.
③With computers, students can learn how to use them for the rest of their lives. Today, computers are used in almost all areas. Students can prepare themselves better for the future if they have computers.
④However, despite these advantages, I think textbooks must stay.
⑤Textbooks are professionally edited. All the facts have been checked. They are put together in the best way. Each chapter builds on what a student has previously learned. On the internet, however, not all the information is true to organized.
⑥With textbooks, it is easier for students to take notes. Scientists have found that taking notes by hand helps students learn more.
⑦Textbooks are also less expensive than computers. While most families can afford textbooks, not all of them can afford a computer. Every student should be allowed to learn what he needs to learn. It’s wrong to rob a student of his right to learn just because he can’t afford the material.
⑧Computers are playing an important role in education. They allow students to learn more. However, I don’t think they can replace textbooks. If students want to learn well, they must use textbooks. Do you agree with me?
